Home › Forum › Ask A Member › 1962 Johnson Fisherman (5.5) gearcase
- This topic has 26 replies, 8 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 5 months ago by
amuller.
-
AuthorPosts
-
August 14, 2016 at 9:18 pm #4981
finally doing the water pump in this, not a trivial job due to the necessity of dismounting the powerhead to disconnect the shift rod. No issues with the pump, but I unintentionally dislodged the pinion bearing housing and see that there is noticeable wear and galling on the thrust surface of the housing. It appears that there is no thrust washer–the upper surface of the pinion just runs against the housing. (Though many of the parts breakdowns do show a separate pinion shaft and a thrust washer.)
I see no sign of gear failure. But, I don’t know how much wear on the thrust surfaces is to be expected or how to evaluate the dimensional loss.
can anyone advise?
PS: I also notice the parts breakdown seems to show the pump mounting screws as shoulder bolts, but ones in the motor are just ordinary machine screws? This important?
August 15, 2016 at 12:01 am #42085You really had to pull the powerhead to drop the lower unit? I have a ’62’ Evinrude 10hp and don’t have to.
August 15, 2016 at 12:04 am #42086I’m confused again…Where is the wear? Between the lower driveshaft and the bottom of the upper seal bushing housing? Or, is the wear between the thrust face of the pinion and the mating surface on the gearcase housing?
I’m guessing it is the first scenario…If so, the upper seal/bushing housing dislodged when you pulled the water pump screws because the driveshaft shock spring has broken/been damaged forcing the lower driveshaft into the bottom of the bushing/seal housing damaging it…
Post some pictures to avoid any confusion….August 15, 2016 at 12:20 am #42088quote beerman57:You really had to pull the powerhead to drop the lower unit? I have a ’62’ Evinrude 10hp and don’t have to.On these you do because there is no other way to disconnect the shift rod. No access window.
August 15, 2016 at 12:23 am #42089quote fleetwin:I’m confused again…Where is the wear? Between the lower driveshaft and the bottom of the upper seal bushing housing? Or, is the wear between the thrust face of the pinion and the mating surface on the gearcase housing?
I’m guessing it is the first scenario…If so, the upper seal/bushing housing dislodged when you pulled the water pump screws because the driveshaft shock spring has broken/been damaged forcing the lower driveshaft into the bottom of the bushing/seal housing damaging it…
Post some pictures to avoid any confusion….Second scenario–thrust face of the pinion against the housing. There is no shock spring on these; they rely on a rubber hub in the prop. Sorry if I was unclear.
August 15, 2016 at 12:42 am #42091August 15, 2016 at 1:17 am #42093Like Wedgie says, these engines were equipped with the shock gearcase and solid prop….I suppose someone could have converted the later model gearcase (with rubber prop hub/no driveshaft shock) to fit though…
Post some pictures of the worn parts…August 15, 2016 at 3:42 am #42099Well, now, this is interesting. What came out of the motor was a one-piece drive shaft from the crank to the pinion gear. But the parts breakdowns up until the end of 5.5s in 1964 show the shock spring setup. I’ll pursue this tomorrow and take some pics.
August 15, 2016 at 6:33 am #42102Somebody pilfered a drive shaft from a later 6-hp..
August 15, 2016 at 8:57 am #42106I think they would have had to switch more than just the driveshaft because the lower pinion diameters are different on the two different style driveshafts….
I guess it is also possible that someone did just swap the driveshafts without realizing the dimensions were different, which might explain why the pinion is worn…..It will be easy to test my theory by simply installing the driveshaft down through the lower gearcase bushing to see if there is excessive clearance… -
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.