Home Forum Ask A Member 40/48/50 gearcase driveshaft removal

Viewing 6 posts - 11 through 16 (of 16 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #40670
    beerman57
    Participant

      Dan helped me a lot when I made the switch. Seeing his post reminded me that my motor came with an older lower unit, with the large shoulder on the driveshaft. I do have a correct L/U for an ’84’ forty hp, with the small shoulder on the driveshaft and will have that driveshaft if I can ever get the bearing carrier out of the propshaft tube!

      #40677
      johnyrude200
      Participant

        Well now Im itching my head. The housings for both motors appear identical, but the driveshafts are clearly different (Ill double check in the AM). The way I discovered this is the driveshaft socket special tool (to hold in place when removing the pinion nut) would fit on the ’92 gearcase, but not the ’00 johnson.

        The johnson is a standard 50hp but I can pull the ID to double check. Didnt notice anything that lead me to believe it was a commercial model.

        Doing a search on M.E. Showed different P/N’s for the two motors too, so I just moved onto a different motor from my inventory to fill the job.

        On a side note, this other (3rd) motor I pulled from inventory is a ’95 50hp, and the impeller was totally blown up. I stopped my workday before going any further and am concerned bits of the impeller may be sucked up into the powerhead water passages. I snaked a spy camera up the exhaust housing water passage and didnt see anything, but stopped at the bottom of the powerhead in fear of getting the camera stuck.

        I pulled apart a ’92 50hp yesterday (blown crank case/melted rod) and when I pulled the exhaust bypass cover and cylinder head, I didnt see many (if any at all) small water passages in this motor, perhaps just the actual cylinder head orifices behind the head gasket.

        Are these motors fairly ‘forgiving’ in terms of allowing perhaps debris the size of the tip of your pinky to pass through without clogs?

        #40869
        johnyrude200
        Participant

          So I went back and verified that the driveshafts are in fact different diameters. And on the ’95 50hp that I pulled (3rd motor), that also had the larger diameter driveshaft. I’m wondering why this ’89-92 model has a smaller diameter driveshaft spline. It shares the diameter of the older versions of these motors.

          #40871
          dan-in-tn
          Participant

            US MEMBER PAY BY CHECK

            1995 was the first year OMC made a 3 cylinder 50hp motor. Of course it had the 3 cylinder gearcase. It is important that you learn family’s of engines in a product line. Even if it is Mercury or Yamaha. There were some strange combinations of driveshaft for the top splines in order for them to fit various 2 cylinder & 3 cylinder motors, but generally the small tube gearcase fit the 2 cylinder motors and the large tube fit the 3 cylinders & above. The exception to the rule was commercial engines. If you look at the pinion nut you can tell which driveshaft you are dealing with. #313339 (5/8" wrench) is small driveshaft, #314730 (7/8"wrench) is large driveshaft.

            Dan in TN

            #40872
            johnyrude200
            Participant

              Thanks Dan, agree still learning about the different groupings. All of these motors are 2-cylinder versions, so I guess it’s been luck of the draw for me on these 3 motors. I’ve only worked on a handful of these 40-48-50’s, so hopefully in another year or two, I’ll have dealt with enough of them to be much more familiar!

              #40917
              beerman57
              Participant

                A friend has a 1999 Evinrude 130hp, it had a factory V6 lower unit until it lunched the gears. We found a V4 L/U for it and just had a little "adjustment" to do to the top of the shift shaft.

              Viewing 6 posts - 11 through 16 (of 16 total)
              • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.