Home Forum Ask A Member Oil Slingers Again

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #255284
    JohnRude
    Participant

      Canada Member

      Thanks to Crosbyman, Mumbles and others for the education on oil slinger operation. I took the crankcase off my 7518 to expose the oil slinger. I had stupidly pushed it down and couldn’t get it back up. The book says it has to be at least 1/16 above the register to allow oil to pool and get sucked back down in the motor. As noted if the return lines are clogged the excess oil at the top would blow by the slinger. I soaked and blew every hole I could find from all directions.

      Question: if the return channels are clear and suction good, wouldn’t air also be pulled past the slinger from above? It isn’t an air tight seal.

      Someone has suggested packing the top of the slinger with very thick grease. This might prevent oil being blown back up past the slinger but also might be sucked down clogging the oil return channels. Someone else suggested sealing this space around the slinger with epoxy. No oil coming up but no air going down.

      Finally, does the whole oil slinger spin on the crank shaft or is it fixed and the crank turns inside? Knowing this for sure might answer all of the above. I will attach a pic originally posted by “rodwadnz”.

      Thanks again. Everything you guys have said has been correct.

      • This topic was modified 4 years ago by JohnRude.
      #255289
      JACQUES
      Participant

        imho…..if any air sucked back in   is not a concern since the  volume of air would be minimal  % compared to the air sucked to operate the  carb venturi effect.

        leaving 1/16  implies  some friction holding the slinger in place just  above  the surface.  The  rotaton  imparts the  sling effect  to spin off any oil to be   recirculated .

         

        (*) I reread the book and  did not see an actual  route   to channel any of the escaped oil under the slinger . Presumably it goes back in  with crankcase vacum on the upstroke  the same way it would have escaped under  crankcase pressure on the down stroke.

        I any event  fixed or not it would surely  rotate anyway just like   any automatic transmission rotates  the inner  parts with the  simple  friction between oily surfaces.

         

        Hopefully  F.R. can educate us on this very specific topic 🙂

        The design seems to have worked all these years so why worry ?  I certainly would not try to  modify it with grease  or epoxy

        with all you have done  to clear any possible blockage (*)  are you experiencing any  further issues ?

        btw   I remember working on an oldy  and the slinger  was loosy goosy on top…I eventually sold that engine but never had any comebacks about it . All the oldies I have resold were  “money back warranty  sales”  so if anyone had issues  they never came back

        . I sell them  all $150 after  a basic refurbish (coils. points , timing ,  carb clean   condensers impeller GC oil…  & most were converted to pump  ) just to recoup my costs  and keep me busy in the basement during winter.

         

        Joining AOMCI has priviledges 🙂

        • This reply was modified 4 years ago by JACQUES.
        • This reply was modified 4 years ago by JACQUES.
        #255296
        frankr
        Participant

          John, you may have missed it, but I’ll promise you that there is a route from the slinger area, down through the reed plate, to the intake manifold.  Manifold vacuum is what sucks the oil down to the manifold to be recycled.  The route through the reed plate includes the holes at the top of the gaskets, shown in the picture.

          You are correct that a passage such as that could cause a lean condition.  But they thought of that a long time ago, and there is a small orifice somewhere along the way to control the amount of airflow.

          Yes, the slinger is a press fit on the shaft and rotates with the shaft, and there is a space below it.  Any attempts to modify the design would—–well modify the way it works.  It is a well proven design, used on a few trainloads of small OMC motors.  No, it is not 100% absolutely effective.  A small bit of oil may get through and onto the points.  But by then, you would be going into it anyway for a routine ignition tune-up, wouldn’t you?

          Gaskets-7.5hp-Intake-Manifold

          #255308
          JACQUES
          Participant

            Frank,  I understand the oil drains down from  the upper and lower crankcase  sending the residues down to the purge valve  but  is there actually a drain under the  slingner or is oil just sucked back via the upper seal/bearing  surfaces. ??   pictures  in the RED book do not mention such a drain to suck the  oil back in.

             

            Jacques

            Joining AOMCI has priviledges 🙂

            • This reply was modified 4 years ago by JACQUES.
            #255314
            frankr
            Participant

              OK so I might have screwed that up.  I don’t have a 7.5 hp to examine, but I do have a 5hp Gale, a 12hp Gale, and a 6hp E’rude.  The 6hp has a real oil seal, but otherwise there are a lot of similarities.  At least on the Gales there is a groove cut in the upper bronze bushing.  The vacuum from the intake manifold is applied to one end of that groove and the other end of the groove connects to the hose going down the side of the powerhead to the lower bearing.  So, intake manifold vacuum is sucking oil from the lower bearing, up through the hose, to one end of the groove to lubricate the bearing.  The other end of the groove goes back to the vacuum source, the intake manifold.  So, where I goofed up is there is no vacuum passage to the area between the bearing and slinger.  Instead, the groove is very close to the top of the bearing and gravity is depended upon to settle the oil back down through the end of the bearing and to the groove.  Um…did I mention an “orifice” to restrict the air flow?  How about that short section of bearing clearance to do the same job?  Pretty dang ingenious if you ask me.

              All this to admit that I still believe the 7.5 is a slight variation.

              Your mileage may differ.

              #255322
              JohnRude
              Participant

                Canada Member

                Crosbyman. While my slinger was “down” on top of the register I did indeed see a hole (maybe two holes) drilled into the top of the register. They go somewhere. You wouldn’t see this unless the slinger was down or if you had taken the crankshaft out. I assume that this is how the excess oil that might collect under the slinger would pool and get sucked back down. There is a slot cut into the casting to the right of the crankshaft that allows most of the oil to go under the crank and lube the bearing. Now the question is that 1/16 of an inch: Clearance for sure if the whole slinger spins but is it critical? Can it be a 1/4? Nick picky I know. Too much clearance and too much oil and not getting sucked down fast enough.

                See personal contact

                #255327
                JACQUES
                Participant

                  book say 1/16  for a reason…..:-)

                  Joining AOMCI has priviledges 🙂

                Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)
                • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.