Home Forum Ask A Member What is an Antique?

Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 36 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #51948
    Anonymous

      I agree it’s something we need to address, sooner, or later, as the "Classic" class grows and grows…

      It has always tweaked me that post-war opposed twins (ie; PO, Speeditwin, Lightfour,…) are "classic" while pre-war alternates like the Mercury KB4 are "antique". Nearly identical models of both were sold pre and post war, but they represent different eras technology-wise.

      I’d be interested in knowing what innovations (and particular motors) can be used to identify different eras….

      #51949
      johnny-infl
      Participant

        Jim – "some of my old outboards run and look better than me".

        That’s funny right there !!! (and rings very true).

        #51959
        Mumbles
        Participant

          In the automotive world, these two cars are now referred to as classics….

          while these ones will always be antiques, no matter what their vintage.

          #51969
          westwind
          Participant

            Canada Member

            There is always some overlap issues with these categories. Not everything fits into a nice slot.

            #51973
            james-davis
            Participant

              I think it depends on your age. 50’s don’t seem old to me because I used them for so long, get back to no carbs and battery, that’s antique to me

              #51976
              b-dittmar
              Participant

                US Member

                It has to change! I think that it need’s to be the age of the motor and not the year.
                Thru my YouTube channel I get told at least 100+ times a year that the (AOMCI is not for me because my motor is not a antique)
                You have to remember that people in there 30s ran motors from the 80s growing up.

                #51982
                20mercman
                Participant
                  quote B-Dittmar:

                  It has to change! I think that it need’s to be the age of the motor and not the year.
                  Thru my YouTube channel I get told at least 100+ times a year that the (AOMCI is not for me because my motor is not a antique)
                  You have to remember that people in there 30s ran motors from the 80s growing up.

                  Ben, I am totally in agreement with you. This does not make sense any more to keep a firm date. As the engineering advancements in motors has progressed, it is only logical that the club represent each generation or milestone in the industry. In another 30 years, we will still have motors that are 97 years old and not considered "Antique" unless we make changes. Your contacts with the general public should be a wake up call to the club that we may be missing out on membership by what is in reality a slight of perception. This is also why we need to add to the number classes, as we are not experiencing the "Classic" group of motors is growing each year, but the "Antique" class can never get bigger. Certainly the vast majority of the members I talk with and the discussions on the forums deal with "Classic" motors. No slight to the antique fans, just that is reality.

                  Steve

                  #52007
                  johnny-infl
                  Participant

                    I am nowhere near a numbers guy about clubs and membership . . . .
                    but, I was a lurker here for a long time. When talking with Pappy (From the Keys)
                    one day about my heartfelt passion for the pre-1960 Johnsons, and me having zero
                    mechanical skills, he said I should think about joining AOMCI. I told him I thought
                    that club was just for "antiques", like the name implies…. after a half hour of investigation, I joined up right away.
                    Then joined the Florida Chapter soon after.
                    so, I agree with Steve about maybe missing out on new members with the confusing data of what’s what.
                    Then, after the board makes the official definitions, make a spot on the Home Page to maybe attract new members.

                    jus my Dos Centavos take on that

                    #52084
                    billy-j
                    Participant

                      US MEMBER PAY BY CHECK

                      I was born in 1955. I would rather be termed a classic than a antique.

                      #52085
                      Tubs
                      Participant

                        The Classic Car Club of America (CCCA) and the Antique Automobile
                        Club of America (AACA) maintain a list of eligible unmodified
                        cars that are called "classic". These are described as "fine" or "distinctive"
                        automobile, either American or foreign built, produced between 1915–1925
                        and 1942–1948. Here are some examples of what the CCCA and the AACA
                        consider classic cars.

                        Mustangs, Camaros, 57 Chevy’s, Starfires, Roadrunners, Barracudas, and
                        the like are considered "Historic" or "Milestone" cars by the CCCA and the AACA.

                        That is if you choose to accept their definitions.
                        Many don’t.

                        Same as with the AOMCI definitions. I find the whole thing pointless.
                        You never get to where everyone agrees and some people will be offended.

                        Most every car or outboard motor has a manufacture, a model, and a date when
                        it was produced that cant be disputed.

                        I’ve decided that a 1943 Overlinker is a 1943 Overlinker. Nothing more.

                        A "Boathouse Repair" is one that done without having tools or the skills to do it properly.

                      Viewing 10 posts - 11 through 20 (of 36 total)
                      • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.